Eight sources that matter.

Research questions in. Commercialization-ready intelligence out — in minutes.

Eight data sources fused into a 10-tab decision-ready dashboard. Real patent numbers. Named PIs. Prioritized next steps. Not another search tool. Not another chatbot.

Try a free analysis See it in action

Free sample analysis — no credit card, no sales call. Usually back within 24 hours.

Grounded in the sources your committee already trusts

PubMed arXiv OpenAlex USPTO NIH RePORTER Grants.gov ClinicalTrials.gov Authoritative web

app.airesearchpartner.com / dashboard

Market growth — analyst consensus

Earth observation · 2024–2030

White-space opportunity scoring

6-axis · On-board edge AI

Priority shortlist

Next 90 days

IP congestion vs. commercial value

Bubble sized by opportunity

Three things your current research workflow doesn't do

Speed alone isn't the story. Speed plus synthesis depth plus a decision is.

01 · Speed

7-minute analyses replace 4–8 hour scoping reports.

What used to take an analyst the better part of a workday — pull patents, scan literature, check funding programs, summarize — happens in the time it takes to drink a coffee.

7 min vs. 4–8 hours of manual scoping

02 · Synthesis depth

Eight data sources, fused into one dashboard.

The US patent corpus, three literature graphs, three funding databases, and the authoritative web — all queried in parallel, cross-referenced, and merged into a single coherent read. No more flipping between PatSnap and PubMed.

PubMed arXiv OpenAlex USPTO NIH RePORTER Grants.gov ClinicalTrials.gov Authoritative web

03 · Decision-ready

A prioritized shortlist, not a data dump.

Every dashboard ends with a ranked list of next moves — file this provisional, apply to that grant, contact this PI — with the citation chain to back each one up. Patterns surfaced; counsel validates.

10 tabs market · IP · funding · investors · universities · priorities

Built for two kinds of decisions

Pick the door that fits.

Same engine. Same dashboard. Two very different conversations about what to do with it.

For technology transfer offices

Disclosure triage, in minutes.

Triage 100 disclosures in the time it takes to triage 1.

Real patent numbers, real grant IDs, real PIs — every claim cited
White-space scoring on 6 axes for fast file / no-file decisions
Committee-ready exports — branded PDF, exec deck, DOCX, all cited

For TTOs For corporate R&D & strategy

External scouting, on demand.

Replace a 4–6 week BCG engagement with a 7-minute analysis.

1% of consulting cost. 70% of the landscape value
One topic in, one decision-ready dashboard out — repeatable across your portfolio
Multi-source synthesis your scouts can't do alone, made auditable for procurement and legal

For Corporate R&D

How it works

From topic to dashboard, in four steps.

No setup. No installation. No “let us train it on your data first.” You drop a topic in. The dashboard comes out.

You provide a topic

A keyword. A paper title. An abstract. A patent number. Or just “evaluate this faculty disclosure.”

Eight sources, in parallel

We fan out across literature, patents, funding, trials, and the open web simultaneously — not one tool at a time.

PubMedarXivOpenAlexUSPTONIHGrants.govTrialsWeb

Synthesis & scoring

Cross-source fusion. White-space scoring on 6 axes. IPC validation. Inline source citations on every claim.

Decision-ready dashboard

10 interactive tabs. Exportable to PDF, DOCX, PPTX. Every claim links back to the source it came from.

See a sample →

Representative sample

This is what the dashboard actually looks like.

A representative sample on the LEO satellite Earth observation market — synthetic data, in the exact shape and depth the product generates. Typical run: ~7 minutes. Every chart is interactive. In the live product, every claim cites a source.

LEO Earth observation — commercialization intelligence Domain: EO imaging · TRL 5–7 · Geography: Global · 7 of the 10 tabs shown

Representative sample

$11.6B

Market by 2030

18.0% CAGR · analyst consensus

Funding programs

NASA · NSF · DARPA · DOE

White-space themes

Edge AI · SAR fusion · anomaly · adaptive

Top universities

Stanford · MIT · ETH · TU Delft · Caltech

$2.1B

VC deployed (2024)

+2.4× YoY · downstream platforms

TRL 4–6

Best white space

On-board edge AI processing

📈 Market growth — two analyst estimates

🥧 Technology mix (2024)

💰 Funding pathway — non-dilutive opportunity ladder

Bar width represents typical award range; duration shows typical project length.

🏢 Top patent assignees

🎯 Opportunity scoring — On-board edge AI

🫧 IP congestion vs commercial value

🎯 Opportunity scoring (6-axis)

🔥 White-space heatmap

🎯 Lab-to-white-space fit

Which lab is the strongest partner for each opportunity. Rows are institutions, columns are the white spaces this analysis surfaced; darker cells mean stronger fit — the dot shows how reachable the lab is for a partnership. In the live product, click a column to rank labs by that white space.

some strong lead

	WS-1On-board edge AI	WS-2SAR–optical fusion	WS-3Anomaly detection	WS-4Adaptive tasking	Fit
StanfordUS	lead				8
MITUS		lead			8
CaltechUS				lead	8
ETH ZürichCH			lead		7
TU DelftNL					7
KTHSE					5

Partnership access: excellent good limited

Every claim in the dashboard links back to one of these sources. Click a chart label or table row in the live product to jump to the underlying citation.

Representative sample — synthetic data in the exact shape the product generates. Request a free analysis to see a live run on your own topic.

The methodology

How we find white space others miss.

Synthesis is table stakes. The analysis protocol behind every dashboard runs six novelty checks that most tools — and most consulting engagements — skip. Not magic: disciplined cross-source pattern work, cited all the way down.

Signal 01

Velocity mismatch

Publication recency weighed against the IP load in the same topic. When recent papers pile up and the patent shelf stays light, a filing window is opening — and the dashboard says so, with the counts behind it. PRO adds year-over-year trendlines computed live from full-corpus counts.

Signal 02

Cross-domain bridges

Methods proven in one field whose technical components match an adjacent field with no published bridge between them. That gap is either your licensing opportunity or a competitor's next move.

Signal 03

Citation negative space

Densely cited clusters surrounded by empty regions of the citation graph. The analysis maps what's around the crowded areas, not just the crowds themselves.

Signal 04

Contrarian picks

Every analysis is required to surface at least one defensible opportunity that runs against the consensus read — flagged as contrarian, argued with citations, for you to stress-test.

Signal 05

Source-set diversity checks

A claim supported by one source family is marked weaker than a claim triangulated across literature, patents, and funding data. The dashboard shows you which is which.

Signal 06

6-axis scoring

Every white-space candidate is scored on market growth, IP openness, funding density, technical maturity, commercialization path, and defense pull — grounded in source counts, not model intuition.

What a velocity-mismatch finding reads like

“Publications in IPC G16H 50/70 grew 47% year-over-year for two consecutive years while patent filings stayed flat — the filing window is opening.”

Illustrative example. PRO accounts get these signals today in the dedicated PRO Insights tab — including live year-over-year trendlines computed from full-corpus publication and filing counts (complete years only) — math shown, sources cited. Continuous monitoring of saved topics is available via Watches.

Use cases

Four ways teams already use it.

TTO disclosure triage

Should we file?

A faculty member submits a disclosure. Run it through AI ResearchPartner. Get prior art, white-space scoring, IPC codes, and a file-or-no-file recommendation in 7 minutes — with the citations to defend it in IP committee.

Typical user: TTO analyst Time saved: 4–8 hours per disclosure

Corporate R&D scouting

Is this a real opportunity?

Pick a target market or technology trend. Get a complete intelligence read — competitors, IP landscape, university partners, M&A candidates — without a 4–6 week consulting engagement and without burning a senior scout's quarter.

Typical user: Innovation scout, R&D strategist Time saved: 4–6 weeks per scoping cycle

VC technical due diligence

What's actually defensible here?

Looking at an academic spinout? Run the founding paper. Get the IP landscape, the funding flows, the competitive context, the investor activity — in 10 minutes per deal, not two weeks.

Typical user: Deep-tech VC partner Time saved: 2 weeks per technical DD

PI & researcher grant search

Where's the funding fit?

Drop in your research focus. Get matched to active NIH, NSF, SBIR, and DARPA programs with deadlines and TRL fit — plus the academic and industrial landscape you need to position your proposal against.

Typical user: PI, postdoc, research office Time saved: Days of program-website spelunking

Built on the sources that matter

No proprietary scraping. No black-box data.

Every source is a real, established research database. We're transparent about where every claim came from because your IP committee, your procurement team, and your scientists will ask.

PubMed

36M+ biomedical citations from NIH/NLM

arXiv

2.4M+ preprints across physics, CS, math, biology

OpenAlex

240M+ scholarly works with author and institution metadata

USPTO

Full US patent corpus — assignees, inventors, IPC classifications, citation graph

NIH

NIH RePORTER

Live NIH grant data — PIs, institutions, award amounts

Grants.gov

All US federal grant programs across NSF, DARPA, DOE, NOAA

ClinicalTrials.gov

Active and completed trials — who's already testing in the indication

Authoritative web

Curated web search (Tavily) for industry reports and analyst data

Honest comparison

How we're different.

We're not the right tool for everything. Here's what we replace, what we don't, and what we sit alongside.

	AI ResearchPartner	$50K BCG-style engagement	Patent analytics platformsPatSnap · Questel Orbit · PatentSight+	TTO & scouting platformsInteum · Wellspring · Cypris	General AIChatGPT · Perplexity · Elicit
Time to result	7 minutes	4–6 weeks	Hours per query — and a trained operator	Search in minutes; the assessment is still yours to write	Minutes — plus the hours you spend verifying
Multi-source synthesis	✓ 8 sources fused, incl. the full US patent corpus	Manual	Patent-centric; literature in some suites, no grants or trials	Partial patents + literature or market modules; grants & trials aren’t core	Open web & Scholar; no patent, grant or trial databases by default
IP white-space scoring	✓ 6-axis quantitative	Bespoke	✓ Patent-based landscaping	Partial opportunity scoring in some suites	Prompt-generated, not repeatable
Funding & investor data	✓ Grant programs, awards & named PIs	✓	Limited investment & M&A; no grant programs	Partial company & partner matching; no grant programs	Limited
University landscape	✓ OpenAlex-grounded, institution + PI level	Manual	Limited literature, no PI landscape	Partial licensable-tech listings, not a PI-level map	Limited
Source-cited every claim	✓	✓	✓ Records, not synthesis	Partial	Partial links, but support varies claim by claim
Decision-ready output	✓ 10-tab dashboard	PowerPoint	Specialist reports & dashboards	Case records, pipelines & campaign reports	Prose
Runs your TTO workflow intake, agreements, royalties	No — we export into it	No	Partial IP docketing modules	✓ System of record (Inteum, Wellspring)	No
Litigation-grade FTO & legal status	No — we sit upstream of that decision	No — refers you to counsel	✓ Specialist depth — pair it with patent counsel	No	No
Cost per analysis	$25–125	$50K–500K	Enterprise, quote-onlyPatSnap Eureka from $399/mo	Quote-only annual license	$20–200/moplus your analyst’s hours

For litigation-grade FTO you still want a specialist patent platform and patent counsel; for case management you keep Inteum or Wellspring. For everything upstream of those decisions, you want us.

✦ AI ResearchPartner PRO

The premium tier. Ten deterministic signal families on every PRO analysis — now including per-competitor USPTO filing pace and disclosed-capital posture, alongside live year-over-year publication trends, industry-authorship share, and talent-mobility signals — plus an Opus-powered strategist brief with a contrarian thesis and its falsifiers. Every signal shows its math, carries its confidence, and cites its sources.

Ten signal families + strategist brief · layered on any base plan · from $3,000/seat/yr (proposed, 2× base)

See PRO in full

Pricing

Three plans, priced to the decision.

Per-seat for TTO and corporate teams. PRO adds the intelligence layer on top of either base. Every plan starts with a free sample analysis — no credit card, no sales call.

TTO

$1,500/ seat / year

University technology transfer offices. 3-seat minimum — $4,500/yr entry; a typical 5-seat R1 office is $7,500/yr.

The full 10-tab commercialization dashboard
All 8 data sources, every claim cited
All six export formats — PDF, DOCX, PPTX exec + board deck, Markdown, live HTML
Team workspace — projects, tags, comments, decision log
Watches — up to 10 topics — with weekly delta digests
PRO Insights lives in the PRO tier

Talk to sales

Corporate R&D

$3,000/ seat / year

Corporate R&D scouts and strategic-intelligence teams. Billed annually; typical $30–75K at 10–25 seats.

Everything in TTO, plus:
Unlimited analyses
API access, SSO (Okta, Google Workspace) & audit logs — scoped as onboarding commitments
Custom analysis templates
A dedicated account manager
PRO Insights lives in the PRO tier

Talk to sales

The premium tier ✦ PRO

2×your base tier

The PRO Insights layer on top of any base plan. Proposed at 2× base — from $3,000/seat/yr (TTO) or $6,000/seat/yr (Corporate R&D).

Everything in your base plan, plus:
PRO Insights — ten deterministic signal families
The Opus-powered strategist brief — consensus, contrarian thesis, moves with horizons, falsifiers
Longitudinal drift — the “Since the last observation” panel + per-watch drift line

Talk to sales

Proposed pricing — talk to us to shape it.

Full tier comparison, contract sizes, and FAQ on the pricing page · see the premium layer on the PRO page.

Send us a topic. We'll send back a real dashboard.

Sample analyses are on us — usually back within 24 hours. The artifact is more persuasive than anything we can write here.

Try a free analysis Schedule a demo

Free sample analysis — no credit card, no sales call. Usually back within 24 hours.

Or just email team@airesearchpartner.com — fastest path to a real conversation.