Replace a 4-week BCG-style engagement with a 7-minute analysis. 1% of the consulting cost. 70% of the landscape value. Repeatable across every topic in your portfolio.
Free sample analysis — no credit card, no sales call. Usually back within 24 hours.
Every “let’s evaluate this technology” question that lands on a corporate scout’s desk needs the same 4-week first pass: academic landscape, IP map, funding flows, competitive read, partner candidates.
The options today are bad. Run it internally — that’s a senior person’s quarter and you get inconsistent depth across topics. Hire BCG or McKinsey — that’s $50K–$500K per engagement and 4–6 weeks of waiting.
Or skip the work, make the call from gut, and miss the white space because nobody had time to look.
Side-by-side: what a $50K consulting deliverable contains, and what a 7-minute AI ResearchPartner analysis returns. Same artifact shape. Same evidentiary depth. Different time and cost surface.
| Section of a typical landscape engagement | AI ResearchPartner | $50K consulting engagement |
|---|---|---|
| Market sizing & sub-segment shares | ✓ Two analyst estimates, sub-market doughnuts | ✓ |
| Patent landscape with top assignees | ✓ USPTO patent corpus + 6-axis IP white-space scoring | ✓ |
| Academic landscape with named labs | ✓ OpenAlex 240M paper graph; institution-tagged | Partial |
| Funding flows (public & private) | ✓ NIH, NSF, DARPA, SBIR, plus VC activity | Partial |
| Competitive landscape with funding stages | ✓ | ✓ |
| White-space recommendations | ✓ Prioritized shortlist, ranked, citation-backed | ✓ |
| Source-cited every claim | ✓ Inline citations, click-through to source | ✓ |
| Repeatable across portfolio | ✓ Run on 30 topics this quarter | No (cost-prohibitive) |
| Time to deliverable | ~7 minutes | 4–6 weeks |
| Cost | $250/seat/month — typical team deals $30K–$75K/yr | $50K–$500K per engagement |
If your strategic question needs a custom 50-page narrative with bespoke executive interviews, hire BCG. If it needs the landscape evidence behind the narrative — fast, repeatable, comparable across topics — use us.
“Is PROTAC delivery to Alzheimer’s a real white space, or a crowded field with two big incumbents?” Get the answer with citations in 7 minutes — instead of greenlighting a 4-week BCG engagement to find out.
“Which 5 labs would be the right sponsored-research targets for our solid-state battery program?” The dashboard names them, ranks them by collaboration ease, and tells you the entry point.
“We have 30 deal-flow targets. Triage them.” Run each through the platform. Get a comparable read on each in minutes, not months. Push the top 5 to deeper diligence.
Beyond the landscape read, every analysis runs novelty checks tuned to competitive questions — the moves that surface 12–18 months before a filing makes them public.
Your Corporate R&D plan ($250/seat/mo; ~$3K/seat/yr, typical deals $30–75K at 10–25 seats) covers the full 10-tab dashboard across all 8 sources, all six export formats, the team workspace, Watches on up to 10 topics, plus API access, SSO, custom templates, audit logs, and a dedicated account manager (onboarding commitments). It does not include PRO Insights — the deterministic signals and the strategist brief are the optional PRO upgrade, 2× your base, from $6,000/seat/yr for Corporate R&D teams. See PRO in full.
Publication growth vs. flat filings marks the spaces where first-mover patents haven’t landed yet — enter before the crowding, not after.
A method proven in one field whose components match yours, with zero published bridges — either your licensing opportunity or a competitor’s next move.
Findings triangulated across literature, patents, and funding are marked stronger than single-source reads — so your team knows what to weight in the deck.
Signals are computed per analysis — the trendline families pull live full-corpus counts — and each run records dated observations into a longitudinal trend store. Watches still handle weekly deltas on the fields your strategy depends on.
Replace the defaults with your real numbers — your reports per year, your typical consulting spend, your team’s loaded weekly cost.
Assumes the published Corporate R&D base ($30K/yr at 10 seats) — a flat seat subscription with unlimited analyses, no per-analysis charge. The PRO upgrade and bespoke enterprise engagements are priced separately.
Some questions need more than a subscription. A co-development engagement adds go/no-go commercial-viability verdicts on your priority candidates — freedom-to-operate context, competitive timing, and defensible white space — plus bespoke analysis templates and a founder + engineer in every call, structured in phases with explicit off-ramps.
In exchange, we ask for a real working relationship — your IP/BD experts validate verdicts weekly, and select learnings feed back into the product. Engagements run $150K–$500K per 6 months depending on scope. This is a bespoke engagement, not a subscription plan — no productized price, so talk to us.
Talk to us about a co-development engagementDrop in the founding paper. Get the IP landscape, the academic source tree, the FTO risks, the competitor patents, and the funding context — before your first call with the founder.
How crowded is the patent landscape around the founder’s claim? Where’s the genuine novelty?
Who has cited the founder’s work? Where did the foundational ideas come from?
Which startups, corporates, and labs are working on the same problem — and how are they funded?
VC teams run on the Corporate R&D plan ($250/seat/month) with a technical-DD template. Set up a recurring account, or see the live demo first.
Schedule a 30-minute demo. We’ll run a real topic from your portfolio in front of you and you’ll have the dashboard before the meeting ends.
Or just email team@airesearchpartner.com with a topic — we’ll send back a real dashboard within 24 hours.